The Sussex-Surrey Dispatch  
Contract All | Expand All              

Sussex and Surry counties were not represented

By Kelly Donnell

WAKEFIELD Sussex and Surry counties were not represented in a meeting held in Richmond last week where potential outlying landing field (OLF) sites were discussed.

The Governorıs office arranged the meeting with state and federal officials last Monday to talk about the OLF sites, at the U.S. Navyıs request. The Navy is considering sites in Sussex, Surry, and Southampton counties where an OLF could be built to train fighter pilots.

Some local representatives were upset last week when they found out that they had not been invited to the meeting.

³Representatives from Virginia Beach and Chesapeake were there, but nobody from Sussex, Surry, or Southampton was there,² said Sussex County Supervisor Eric Fly.

Steve Mondul, deputy assistant to the Governorıs Office of Commonwealth Preparedness, said that local representatives were not left out on purpose, but blamed the error on a ³glitch.²

³We thought we invited legislators from every place that might be affected, but through a glitch in our office, the representatives in the Southampton and Surry area did not get an invitation to that meeting,² Mondul said on Wednesday.

³However, all of the legislators, including the ones from Southampton, Surry, Prince George, and Sussex, we facilitated meetings individually with Admiral Anderson. All of the delegates and senators from all of the areas which would be affected by any possible site have had an opportunity to meet with the Navy.²

Mondul said that no new information was discussed at the meeting on Monday, and that the information provided by the Navy that day ³supplemented² the information at previous meetings.

³The Navy asked for the opportunity to provide information to legislators from the state, and we facilitated the meeting. Nothing was discussed at the meeting that was not discussed individually with the delegates before,² he said.

Regardless of whether new information was available at the meeting, local representatives say they would like to be included in these types of meetings.

³Anything where the OLF is discussed, we want to be at the table,² said Fly. ³Itıs our future at stake.²

It isnıt likely that state or Navy officials will be holding a local meeting in the near future to compensate for last Mondayıs meeting, either. Citizens in Sussex, Surry, and Southampton who have begun uniting recently to fight the OLF and hope for an audience with Navy officials will have to keep waiting as well.

For now, citizens are being asked to relay all concerns and questions to local representatives in lieu of having town-hall style meetings.

³We have asked to work those type of meetings through county managersı offices as a primary point of contact,² said U.S. Navy Commander Richard Catoire.

Any meetings that are held should be an opportunity for citizens and Navy officials to exchange information in a two-way dialogue, he added.

³We found that meetings of 800 people generally donıt provide that.² However, residents of Sussex, Surry, Prince George, and Southampton counties will have an opportunity to give formal statements to the Navy about the OLF sites at scoping meetings in about two months. A Federal Register must be published as the Navy begins the process of studying the Cabin Point, Dory, and Mason sites, as well as the two sites in North Carolina. The register marks the beginning of the 24 to 30 month environmental impact studies of each site.


A regional fight against the OLF is possible

By Kelly Donnell

WAKEFIELD A regional fight against the OLF is possible.

As opposition grows to the U.S. Navy's plan to consider sites in Sussex, Surry, and Southampton counties as potential locations for an outlying landing field (OLF), county governments in the three counties have begun to consider working together to fight the plan.

The Southampton County Board of Supervisors recently expressed an interest in working with other localities that would be affected by the OLF.

Two sites- the Mason and Dory sites- include land in both Southampton and Sussex counties. The Cabin Point site is located in Surry County, and covers some land in Prince George.

Sussex County Administrator Mary Jones said last week that she had been in contact with Southampton County Administrator Mike Johnson.

“We are in the process of continuing those conversations to determine how to go about a cooperative effort,” she said.

“The board has gone on record in opposition of the OLF in Sussex, and the board is looking at working in concert with Surry, Southampton, and Greensville in order to have a united front to avoid placement of an OLF in the region,” Jones said.

Actions similar to those taken last month by the Southampton County board are also expected to be taken this week by the Surry County Board of Supervisors, according to Surry County Administrator Tyrone Franklin. He said the board would be discussing the OLF in its meeting on Thursday.

Although each individual locality has been represented in meetings at the state level with the Governor's Office of Commonwealth Preparedness and Navy officials, the counties have not yet come together for a group meeting.

Southampton County has also indicated its willingness to work with Sussex, Surry, and other communities through the Crater Planning District Commission.

Resources may be available through the Crater PDC that could help the counties ward off consideration of OLF sites here.

Sussex, Surry, and Prince George counties, as well as the cities of Petersburg and Emporia, are included in the 11 jurisdictions that comprise the Crater PDC.

Dennis Morris, staff director of the Crater PDC, said that the commission's role to its member jurisdictions include assisting with economic development, small business development, transportation planning, and assisting in interpreting federal regulations.

Planning district commissions have access to a wealth of data and information through an agreement with various federal and state agencies, he said. Access to this kind of information helps localities in achieving a number of goals, including rural transportation plans and comprehensive plan updates.

“We're familiar with collecting data, tabulating data, and putting it in presentation format,” Morris said.

Among the resources the Crater PDC has that could be useful in fighting the OLF is a geographic information system (GIS) for mapping.

It is possible, too, that the localities could find legal representation through the Crater PDC.

“We do not have an in-house attorney,” Morris said. “We do have a contractual relationship with a firm that we have used since 2001 on the BRAC (base realignment and closure) process. We started that relationship because of assisting Fort Lee, the Defense Supply Center, and Fort Pickett, to prepare them for BRAC evaluations in 2005.”

The legal work was funded by the member jurisdictions that would have been affected by the base realignments or closings, and any attorneys working for local governments on the OLF issue would also be funded locally.

At this point there is no agreement or defined plan of action between either Sussex or Surry county and the Crater PDC.


Their land is not for sale - February 13, 2008

SUSSEX – By Kelly Donnell

Families and landowners in the southern end of Sussex County plan to fight the U.S. Navy, and say they won’t give their land up willingly.

Since the Navy announced three sites in the area that it will consider for building an outlying landing field to train F/A-18 pilots, many landowners and residents of the rural areas have banded together in protest.

The Mason site, located in between Jarratt, Grizzard, and Drewryville, contains land with a unique history. It’s not just land, area residents say; it’s their heritage, their history, their livelihoods, and their future.

Along the roads within the site area, black signs with white letters proclaiming “No OLF” dot the landscape.

At the historic Mason farm, a local landowner has erected a four-foot by eight-foot sign painted red and white in protest of the OLF.

Several historic homes and buildings are located near the proposed airfield site, but to the people who live there, it’s more than just old structures and land.

Many families living near or within the Mason site descend from a single patriarch. Elisha Harrell moved his wife and children from their home in North Carolina and settled there in 1882.

He had traveled through the area while fighting in the Civil War, and liked it enough to relocate and raise his 13 children in Sussex County.

Near the intersection at Mason and Gray roads, Elisha Harrell, his wife, and many descendants lie in perpetual rest within the family cemetery. Harrell descendants now fear that the tranquility of this site could be replaced with the roar of jet engines overhead.

Elisha Harrell was Martin Harrell Sr.'s great-great grandfather. The youngest members of the family now mark the seventh generation of Harrells being raised in the same community, Martin said.

If the Navy selects the Mason site to build the OLF, families who have lived there all their lives would be uprooted, he said.

Other family members – younger generations hoping to build homes on ancestral land, or retirees wishing to come home to spend their golden years – are now in limbo as well, area residents say. Prospective homebuilders aren't likely to take the risk of settling there, only to face losing their homes within a few years.

Many are also concerned about the stress that the OLF may cause on elderly people in the area.

“Just the thought of relocating, or just the thought of being in the area – it's too much for them,” said Martin.

“A lot of this land in the core area is family farms. A lot of the farms are century farms,” said Connie Edwards Harrell, who also lives within the Mason site. “You've got history here. It might mean nothing to the powers that be, but it means a lot to us.”

Sussex County is home to 14 Century Farms, a few of which would be affected by the OLF if it were built at the Mason site. Century Farms are recognized by the state when the same family has farmed one piece of land continuously for 100 years or more.

Helen Harrell owns one of the Century Farms located within a short distance of the proposed airfield.

“We're right here at the line,” Helen said from her kitchen last week. She and her late husband, Hugh, raised their children on the family farm. She understands too well how the OLF may affect other farmers, too.

“What about the farmers?” she asked. “They can't just move, and set up and farm somewhere else.”

Much of the land within the Mason site is either agricultural, or is owned by timber companies. These landowners say they doubt the Navy is considering this land as part of a business, instead of just open, unused land.

Maps released by the Navy two weeks ago have given area residents a better idea of whether or not their homes or property lie within the proposed airfield. However, many people are equally confused, as the maps are not very detailed.

Several roads in the Grizzard and Jarratt area are not shown on the maps. Other frequently traveled roads, such as Fortsville and Harrell roads, cut through the OLF site, leaving people to wonder what will happen to these routes.

With fewer landmarks on the maps, landowners are having trouble determining how, or if, they will be affected by the OLF, too.

“We've heard all sorts of figures,” said Martin, but residents still don't know exactly where the core airfield area extends, or where the buffer would be located, and whether landowners will lose their property.

“How far does it go? Where does it start and where does it stop?” he asked. “Twenty-eight thousand acres is a lot of land. It encompasses people all around who don't know they're in that area.”

He believes there are two homes within the core area.

“There’s right many involved in the buffer,” Martin added. “But, we’re so close we might as well be in it.”

Residents are relying on speculation, and the obscure maps posted recently on the website for the Office of Commonwealth Preparedness, to try to determine exactly which property is in the target area.

“We should have access to all of that information,” Connie agreed, “if they're not hiding anything like they say they are.

“If we were just told a few things to let us know where we stand,” she added, many residents might better understand the Navy's plans.

Residents want to know if their land will be included in the core area, or the buffer zone, and whether the Navy would condemn the land, or negotiate sales. The idea of easements is raising questions, as well. Some have heard that the Navy could consider buying the development rights to certain parcels of land, but there are no details yet about what kind of terms or price would be offered.

“Our heritage, our livelihood – you can’t put a value on that,” Martin said.


The signatures say it all. - February 13, 2008

WAKEFIELD – By Kelly Donnell

An online petition is circulating among local communities, showing citizens’ united opposition to the idea of an outlying landing field being constructed here.

The petition, found on the internet at www.PetitionOnline.com, asks Governor Tim Kaine to remove sites in Sussex and Southampton from consideration. The Dory and Mason sites, which cross both county lines, are two sites being considered out of five possible locations for construction of a OLF training field for Navy pilots.

The petition’s creators, Gary and Sarah Parker Christian, don’t live in the area, but have family ties here.

As of Friday, 900 people had signed the petition, lending their support in the fight against the OLF.

“It is quite wonderful to see how many people have signed and left notes on the petition,” Gary Christian said last week.

Dear Governor Kaine,

We wrote to you in September of last year as you were considering the Navy's proposed sites for the Outlying Landing Field (OLF). We had hoped you would eliminate the Sussex and Southampton county sites because of the overwhelming opposition by local residents. These sites are now part of the final list you released several weeks ago. In September, we submitted a URL for a petition web site: http://www.PetitionOnline.com/1960mapa/petition.html

At that time, we had a little over 300 signatures. Since your announcement this month, that number has doubled to about 650. We also mailed you hard copy of the petition and will do so again. We urge you to read the messages of signers of this petition. It is not just a list of names but a very personal and profound expression of deep feelings by the people who have lived and worked this land for hundreds of years. Many have asked you to be true to your word not to force any county to accept the OLF if not wanted by local residents. We ask you the same, in the name of families who have helped build this nation. Without people like this, there would be no United States of America, and nothing for our pilots to defend.

We appreciate your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Sarah Parker Christian (the Parker family Sussex County) Gary Christian


How will an outlying landing field affect local wildlife preserves - February 13, 2008

SUSSEX - By Kelly Donnell

The Nature Conservancy, an international preservation organization that owns wildlife preserves in Sussex County, is looking to find out. The organization is beginning its own study to evaluate how a training field for Navy jets could impact the preserves and wildlife there.

Two Nature Conservancy preserves are located within a short distance of the Dory site, although the proposed site does not cross either preserve.

“The Big Woods preserve is located five miles from the center of the landing field and one and a half miles north of the OLF buffer,” said Brian van Eerden, director of The Nature Conservancy’s Southern Rivers Program. “The Piney Grove Preserve is located seven and a half miles from the center of the landing field and four miles north of the OLF buffer.”

The Piney Grove preserve, southwest of Wakefield, is the home of Virginia’s rarest bird. In fact, van Eerden said, the only group of birds surviving in the state live here.

“The Nature Conservancy has been intensively managing this property for the past eight years to ensure the woodpecker’s survival, which was near extinction,” he said.

“The closest active red-cockaded woodpecker cavity tree on Piney Grove Preserve from the center of the landing field is eight miles.”

The red cockaded woodpecker made the national endangered species list in 1970. The Live, mature pines can be found in the Piney Grove Preserve, and the trees necessary to the woodpecker’s habitat. Local preserves are also home to the rare fox squirrel.

Since the U.S. Navy released maps clearly showing the three sites where it would consider constructing an OLF, The Nature Conservancy can now begin trying to identify potential effects on the local habitat.

“The Conservancy will consult with experts on red-cockaded woodpecker ecology to conduct its evaluation on the potential impacts of the proposed landing field on the species,” van Eerden said.

The Navy has begun its own 30 month environmental impact study to determine whether either of three potential sites in Virginia – located at Cabin Point in Surry County, or Dory or Mason in Sussex and Southampton counties – or two sites in North Carolina would make a good home for an outlying landing field. The OLF would be used to train F/A-18 pilots in touch-and-go landing exercises.