Navy to prepare 5 OLF studies - Modified: Apr 09, 2008
The Associated PressRALEIGH -- The Navy said Wednesday that it will continue to pursue plans to build a practice landing field for its jet fighters by preparing environmental impact statements for five possible sites in two states.
The Navy said the environmental assessments for the sites, three in Virginia and two in North Carolina, would take more than two years to complete.
A Navy statement said the North Carolina sites are Hale's Lake in Camden and Currituck counties and Sandbanks in Gates County. Virginia sites were identified as Cabin Point, Dory and Mason.
"These sites each have operational, environmental, and population characteristics that make them viable site alternatives for further analysis," the Navy said in a notice of intent published in the Federal Register.
An auxiliary landing field would include an 8,000-foot runway for use by pilots from Navy air bases in Norfolk, Va., and Virginia Beach, Va. The site also would have an air traffic control tower and other support buildings.
Pilots now use a field in Chesapeake, Va., to practice night carrier landings before deploying.
For several years, the Navy tried to locate a so-called outlying landing field in Washington and Beaufort counties, where they met fierce opposition from local residents and state officials concerned about an adjacent wildlife refuge. The Navy said in January it wouldn't try to build the field in that location.
Some residents near the new sites in North Carolina have started working against the $230 million project, saying it would ruin their rural way of life.
Foes of Navy field had persistence, not power - January 27, 2008
Jerry Allegood, Staff WriterPLYMOUTH - It shaped up like a classic David-and-Goliath battle -- a coalition of Eastern North Carolina farmers, housewives, small-town politicians and bird lovers versus the forces of the U.S. Navy, the sprawling Virginia Beach metropolis and powerful Virginia politicians. Most thought the little guys had no chance. Even the little guys had their doubts. But they were wrong. They won.
Navy officials announced Tuesday that they were scrapping plans to build a remote airfield in Washington and Beaufort counties. Even longtime opponents were taken aback. Some had fought plans for the outlying landing field -- commonly called an "OLF" -- for seven years.
"It's still so hard to believe after all we've been through," said Doris Morris, a spokeswoman for the opposition group No-OLF. "I feel like somebody needs to pinch me to make sure I'm awake."
She said the group is planning a community gathering to celebrate the victory and thank supporters. But they aren't quite ready to disband or yank up the hundreds of "No OLF" signs planted in yards and along roadsides in the region.
Now the Navy is looking at two sites in northeastern North Carolina, Hale's Lake in Camden and Currituck counties, and Sandbanks in Gates County. Morris said her group will help landowners and county officials in their fight, too.
For years, the Navy wanted to build a $230 million airfield near Plymouth, about 100 miles east of Raleigh, where jets based in Virginia Beach and Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point could practice carrier-type landings. After a $4 million environmental study on several sites, the Navy said its preferred site would take in about 30,000 acres straddling the two counties.
The Navy had already acquired about 2,000 acres.
Washington County real estate agent Mike Swearingen wasn't too worried when the Navy started quietly talking about building the airfield several years ago.
"Like everybody else," he said," I didn't know what an OLF was."
He said he organized early meetings against the project after a local property deal fell through when a Virginia Beach lender learned of the possibility of an airfield. He contended that the fast-growing Virginia Beach area wanted to move the noisy jets to North Carolina.
Landowners and officials in the two counties said the project would wipe out family farms and stifle economic growth. Others said the airfield was too close to Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge, a 113,000-acre retreat for migrating waterfowl.
Plenty of people doubted local opposition could stop the Navy juggernaut, especially after increased support of the military following the 2001 terrorist attacks.
'Never going to win'
"We had 70 to 80 percent of the people say, 'We support your cause, but you're never going to win,' " said Jennifer Alligood, chairwoman of the No-OLF group.
She said they had testimonials from people who did not want to give up farms that had been in families for generations. But they initially had no money, expertise or plan for taking on the Navy.
Alligood and Morris were both distributing anti-OLF literature independently when they met at Morris' mailbox beside the highway. They began meeting regularly at Alligood's home to plan and pray for guidance.
"We would just sit around the table and try to come up with ideas about what to do and how to do it," Morris said. "We were often told we were not following protocol, but we were fighting with all our hearts and souls."
Larger groups met in farm garages. They raised money and morale with pig pickings and community meetings.
Opponents didn't have money for television advertising, so they divided the state and attended meetings of county boards of commissioners because the meetings were televised. Alligood recalled an early presentation in Western North Carolina when a board readily expressed support and offered to endorse a resolution. She didn't have one ready. "That's how green we were," she said.
Eventually No-OLF gained support from about 100 organizations, ranging from national outdoor groups to local tourism promotion agencies.
There was no shortage of eye-catching publicity stunts. A teenager's PowerPoint presentation consisting of photos of houses and farm buildings that would be lost to the OLF gave outsiders a look at the community.
Farmers rode to rallies in tractor convoys. Others towed a trailer with a homemade model of a Navy jet bearing anti-OLF messages at rallies and parades.
"They won first prize in the Belhaven Christmas parade last year," Morris said, laughing.
The most difficult aspect of the campaign, she said, was being labeled unpatriotic for criticizing the Navy's plans
Beaufort and Washington counties joined with conservation groups in a federal lawsuit to halt the airfield. A federal judge ruled that the Navy's environmental study was inadequate, a ruling that cheered opponents and stymied the Navy but did not end the issue.
Despite the emotional appeals, many participants agreed that the most crucial allies were thousands of ducks, geese and swans that spend the winter at national wildlife refuges and private lands in the area.
Joe Albea of Greenville, an outdoor writer and television program host, had been warning since 2001 that the airfield was not compatible with the waterfowl. He distributed striking videos of huge flocks of snow geese taking to the air and arranged visits for reporters and government officials.
'Birds stopped it'
"The birds stopped it, no question," he said. "If the birds had not been there, it would be operational by now."
For Albea, justice prevailed, and a seven-year battle is over.
But Jan DeBlieu of the N.C. Coastal Federation says the battlefield has simply shifted.
"You can bet that the Navy is hoping our opposition will fall apart, now that the fight has been shifted away from the wildlife refuges," she said. "We still have a long way to go."
Jerry.Allegood@newsobserver.com or (252) 752-8411
Dole stands with OLF foes - January 26, 2008
Navy looking for practice flight site Zac Goldstein, The (Elizabeth City) Daily AdvanceCURRITUCK - U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Dole, R-N.C., met with officials of Currituck and Camden counties Friday and reaffirmed her support of local opposition to a U.S. Navy outlying landing field in Camden County.
"I am not going to support a site for an OLF unless there is broad local support," Dole said. "Camden and Currituck are not raring to go on this."
Dole's visit followed Tuesday's announcement that the Hales Lake site in Camden and the Sandbanks area in Gates County are among five sites in North Carolina and Virginia that the Navy will study further for potential sites for a new practice landing field.
While in Currituck County Friday afternoon, Dole met with Jeff Jennings, Camden's commission chairman, Randell Woodruff, Camden County manager, Barry Nelms, Currituck's commission chairman and Dan Scanlon, Currituck County manager.
In a meeting at the Historic Currituck Courthouse, all four local officials expressed their opposition to the Navy's $230 million OLF project.
Nelms said that while the Hales Lake site is in Camden County, an OLF there would have serious effects on Moyock, in neighboring Currituck County.
That's because the proposed OLF flight path extends over three elementary schools and numerous homes in Moyock. Business in Moyock, Currituck's chief commercial area, already has begun to suffer because of concerns the Navy will select the Hales Lake site for its OLF, Nelms said.
"It's already adversely impacted us," he said.
Officials said they do not see a way to get the Hales Lake site removed from consideration, as the Navy has made its announcement and is moving forward.
"We don't know what we can do yet," Woodruff said. "We have to explore all the options."
Scanlon said opposition to the OLF is not opposition to the military, as many retired veterans living in the area also have voiced opposition to the landing field.
"This is an economic and quality-of-life issue," Scanlon said.
There also are concerns that an OLF could have negative environmental effects on Mackay Island and the Great Dismal Swamp. In a letter dated Jan. 22 to Dole, Secretary of the Navy Donald C. Winter wrote that he is scrapping a current supplemental environmental impact Statement and will prepare a new EIS for the five sites under consideration.
"I have decided to terminate the current draft SEIS and prepare a new Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy Act that analyzes five new potential OLF site," Winter states in the letter.
Dole, who is a member of the Armed Services Committee -- the legislative body that helps appropriate military funding -- said Friday she would relay opposition to OLF to the appropriate officials. She also offered to arrange meetings between officials from Camden, Currituck and the Navy. She is scheduled to meet with Gates County officials soon.
Navy ditches Plan A for landing field site - January 23, 2008
Wade Rawlins, Staff WriterThe U.S. Navy is dropping plans to build a jetway for aircraft pilots to practice landings in Washington County, focusing instead on two potential sites in northeastern North Carolina and three in Virginia.
North Carolina leaders, who vehemently opposed the Navy's original choice near Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge, applauded the Navy's announcement Tuesday that it would abandon plans for the site, where thousands of birds migrate annually. At the same time, several local leaders vowed to fight the new proposed sites in northeastern North Carolina.
The Secretary of the Navy's Office said the Navy would study two sites in North Carolina, Hale's Lake in Camden and Currituck counties, and Sandbanks in Gates County.
The study is expected to take more than two years.
"These sites each have operational, environmental and population characteristics that make them viable site alternatives for further analysis," the Navy said.
The Navy wants to build a $230 million airfield in a remote area for fighter pilots to simulate night landings on aircraft carriers. The five new sites were chosen for their proximity to Oceana Naval Air Station in Virginia. The Navy has been looking to shift nighttime training away from its existing Fentress landing field in Chesapeake, Va., because of complaints about noise.
The former preferred site in Washington and Beaufort counties was favored in part because it was convenient to fighter jet squadrons based at Oceana and at Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point in Havelock. The Navy's new announcement makes no mention of Cherry Point.
Lt. Cmdr. Cindy Moore, a spokeswoman for the Navy, said the Navy still plans to base two squadrons of Super Hornets at Cherry Point and eight at Oceana. Moore said Cherry Point could support landing field practices without a new airfield. The so-called outlying landing field will serve Oceana and aircraft on carriers in Norfolk, Moore said.
Siding with residents
U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Dole said in a statement that she was pleased the Navy had dropped consideration of the five original sites in Eastern North Carolina. But Dole said she was discouraged that the Navy had yet to consult with local leaders in Gates, Camden and Currituck counties about its plans.
"Based on my extensive discussions with officials and residents in Gates, Camden and Currituck Counties, it is clear that the Navy's proposal to locate an OLF at those sites will be met with considerable resistance," Dole said.
"Broad local support for an OLF is essential, and as I have assured North Carolinians and advised the Navy, I will oppose the Navy's efforts to acquire any site in North Carolina that fails to meet this standard," she said.
Moore, the Navy spokeswoman, said the Navy had worked with leaders in North Carolina and Virginia and commended them for their help in providing information. "We look forward to working further with local and state officials as well," Moore said.
Local officials in both counties, as well as state leaders, have expressed opposition to the airfield in their counties.
Camden County Manager Randell Woodruff said that the proposed Hale's Lake site was in a growing area and that a 30-month study could stifle economic development.
State Senate leader Marc Basnight of Manteo, whose district includes Camden and Currituck counties, said he would continue to oppose the sites.
"He has said that locating an OLF in a rural, economically distressed area is absolutely unacceptable," said Schorr Johnson, a spokesman for Basnight. "With today's disappointing news, Senator Basnight vows to continue to fight on behalf of families who have worked this land for generations."
The Easley administration, which opposed an airfield near the wildlife refuge, worked with the Navy last year to identify additional sites in North Carolina -- including those in Gates and Camden counties. But Easley then said he would not support the site if the local communities didn't want the air strip.
"The governor is pleased the Navy has dropped the Washington County site and is starting their process over," said Renee Hoffman, an Easley spokeswoman. "We will need to see what kind of economic benefit versus burden is in the new Navy package so the citizens of Camden and Gates counties will be able to decide whether it is satisfactory to have the OLF in their communities."
Taken off the list
The Navy also announced that it is abandoning four other North Carolina sites previously under consideration in Craven, Bertie, Hyde and Perquimans counties.
Chris Canfield, executive director of Audubon North Carolina, applauded the Navy's decision to drop its proposal for a landing field site next to the refuge. Audubon was among the groups that sued to block the Navy's plans.
"This is a victory for the hundred thousand birds that winter there and for the farmers that live there," Canfield said. "It is a victory for the people of North Carolina and the political leaders who represent them. And it is also a victory for the Navy and its pilots, which deserve the safest training possible, without the threat of catastrophic collisions with large birds."
wade.rawlins@newsobserver.com or (919) 829-4528
State targets Virginia air base Published: Jul 21, 2005 12:30 AM Modified: Oct 24, 2005 07:55 AM
If Naval Air Station Oceana closes, officials hope jets and payroll move to North Carolina
Jay Price, Staff WriterTalk of replacing Virginia's Naval Air Station Oceana has Eastern North Carolina leaders dreaming dollar-sign dreams: a scratch-built jet base that would be like plopping a small city amid soybean and tobacco fields.
The payroll would be $1 billion to $1.5 billion, and the effect on the local economy probably would be three times that, said Hugh Overholt, a New Bern consultant for a group trying to bring more jobs to Havelock's Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point.
"This dwarfs any company you can think of," he said. "It would be bigger than IBM, bigger than all of them. If they built it in Craven County, the little town of Vanceboro could grow as big as New Bern."
A group of North Carolina lobbyists and local and state leaders, including representatives from Gov. Mike Easley's office, will meet next week to decide how to pursue a replacement for Oceana, whose future the federal Base Realignment and Closure Commission cast into doubt this week.
The same qualities that have the Navy fighting to put a practice landing field for Oceana's jets in Eastern North Carolina also make the region attractive for a massive new base. There is plenty of cheap land. There are few problems with encroaching development. And it's much closer than Georgia to Norfolk-based aircraft carriers.
"Close is good," John E. Allen of Chesapeake, Va., a former commander of Oceana, said in a telephone interview Wednesday.
Allen said that he hopes Oceana isn't closed but that if a replacement has to be built, it doesn't take much imagination to see it in North Carolina.
Development in Virginia Beach has nearly choked Oceana, which has been described as the nation's most encroached-upon base. It's home to the Navy's East Coast fighter jets. And in recent years, plans to phase in a new, louder model -- the F/A-18 Super Hornet -- have increased complaints.
This month, the base closure commission asked the Pentagon why, in its recommendations for closings, it didn't suggest moving Oceana's jets to Georgia's Moody Air Force Base. A Navy admiral told the commission Monday that Oceana might have to be replaced within the next decade -- an even louder jet, the F-35, could be phased in as soon as 2012 -- but that until then, Oceana would do.
Pentagon officials have said it would be too expensive to refit the aging Georgia base, that it would be bad to split the jets among several bases and that the best option is a fresh East Coast base.
The commission voted Tuesday to consider changes at Oceana and also decided to continue looking at a Pentagon recommendation to downsize the Air Force presence at Pope Air Force Base in Fayetteville.
The commission's decision Tuesday to put Oceana on its list to study for closure shocked Virginia officials. But it might be trying to help the Navy develop options, several experts said.
"Oceana may close in the future, but it's not going to close in the 2005 round," said Christopher Hellman, a policy analyst who follows base closing issues for the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation in Washington.
It's clear, however, that the Navy knows Oceana has problems and wants a new base, he said.
Lew Borman, a spokesman for Lt. Gov. Beverly Perdue -- the state's point person on military affairs -- said North Carolina would press for at least some of Oceana's jets, along with their well-paid pilots and the workers who maintain them.
"We're definitely interested in taking on more aircraft and will continue to let both the BRAC commission and Department of Defense know of our ability to do just that," he said.
Overholt thinks the Navy has intended all along to place a base in North Carolina. As the Navy has bought land for its controversial practice landing field in Washington and Beaufort counties, it bought 33,000 acres, versus Oceana's 6,800 or so.
A federal judge has so far blocked the Navy from using that site, and a Richmond appeals court held a hearing on that decision Wednesday. Despite the legal battle, North Carolina's allure remains strong: The Navy has said it plans to examine possible sites in four other Down East counties for its so-called outlying landing field.
Eastern North Carolina is already home to several bases, including two of the nation's largest, Camp Lejeune and Fort Bragg. As traditional sources of income -- such as textiles, furniture and tobacco -- fade in rural North Carolina, the military has come to play an increasingly larger role in the state's economy.
Oceana is the largest employer in Virginia's most populous city. Building a replacement Down East, Overholt said, would be like suddenly sprouting a city of 15,000 -- and that's not including the workers who would be drawn to nearby businesses.
The commission will decide its final list of base closings and changes before submitting it to President Bush by Sept. 8. Bush can send it to Congress for a vote or ask the commission to modify it.
Staff writer Jay Price can be reached at 919-829-4526 or mailto:jprice@newsobserver.com